Critical Reasoning Strategies for GRE | Arguments & Assumptions

The GRE Verbal section isn't just testing your vocabulary—it's evaluating how well you think. Critical reasoning questions demand that you dissect arguments, spot hidden assumptions, and evaluate evidence like a lawyer preparing for trial.

If you've ever stared at a Reading Comprehension passage wondering where to even begin, you're not alone. The good news? Critical reasoning is a skill you can systematically develop, and it directly improves your performance across multiple question types.

Why Critical Reasoning Matters More Than You Think

Think of critical reasoning as the backbone of GRE Verbal. Whether you're tackling Reading Comprehension, Text Completion, or Sentence Equivalence, you're constantly analyzing relationships between ideas, identifying logical gaps, and evaluating the strength of claims.

Most aspirants focus on memorizing vocabulary or speed-reading passages. While these help, they miss the fundamental skill: understanding how arguments work. A strong argument has premises (evidence) leading to a conclusion. A weak one? It's built on shaky assumptions or insufficient evidence.

The Anatomy of a GRE Argument

Before you can critique an argument, you need to recognize its parts. Every argument contains:

The Conclusion: The main claim or point the author wants you to accept. This is what they're trying to prove.

The Premises: The evidence, facts, or reasons supporting the conclusion. These are the "because" statements.

The Assumptions: The unstated beliefs that connect premises to the conclusion. These are the invisible bridges holding the argument together—and often, they're where arguments fall apart.

Let's look at an example: "Company sales increased by 20% after launching a new advertising campaign. Therefore, the campaign was successful."

The conclusion is clear: the campaign worked. The premise is the sales increase. But what's the assumption? That the sales increase was caused by the campaign, not by external factors like seasonal demand, competitor closures, or economic trends.

Strategy 1: Identify the Conclusion First

Most test-takers read arguments linearly, from start to finish. This wastes time and makes it harder to spot the logical structure.

Instead, ask yourself: "What is this argument trying to convince me of?" Look for conclusion indicators like "therefore," "thus," "consequently," or "this shows that."

Once you've identified the conclusion, everything else falls into place. The premises become clear, and you can start looking for gaps in logic.

Here's a practical tip: physically circle or underline the conclusion in your scratch work. This simple act forces your brain to lock onto the main claim before getting distracted by supporting details.

Strategy 2: Hunt for Hidden Assumptions

Assumptions are the silent killers of GRE arguments. They're the unstated beliefs that, if proven false, would destroy the entire argument.

The GRE loves testing your ability to spot these hidden assumptions. In "Weaken the Argument" questions, the correct answer often challenges an assumption. In "Strengthen the Argument" questions, it supports one.

Try this approach: After identifying the conclusion and premises, ask yourself, "What must be true for this conclusion to logically follow?" Whatever comes to mind is likely an assumption.

Consider this argument: "Students who study abroad have better job prospects. Therefore, universities should require all students to study abroad."

The conclusion: mandatory study abroad programs. The premise: better job prospects. But notice the assumption: that all students can afford to study abroad, that the job market values international experience universally, and that mandatory programs would produce the same benefits as voluntary ones.

Each of these assumptions could be challenged, weakening the argument.

Strategy 3: Distinguish Between Correlation and Causation

This is where most GRE arguments try to trick you. Just because two things happen together doesn't mean one causes the other.

The test writers love presenting scenarios where correlation is assumed to be causation. Your job? Recognize when an argument makes this logical leap.

Example: "Cities with more bookstores have higher literacy rates. Building more bookstores will improve literacy."

Do bookstores cause literacy, or do literate populations support more bookstores? Could both be caused by a third factor, like higher education levels or economic prosperity? These are the questions you need to ask.

When you spot a causal claim, immediately consider: Could the causation run in reverse? Could a third factor explain both observations? Is this mere coincidence?

Strategy 4: Evaluate Evidence Quality

Not all evidence is created equal. The GRE tests whether you can distinguish between strong and weak support for a claim.

Strong evidence is specific, relevant, and sufficient. Weak evidence is vague, tangential, or limited.

Ask yourself: Is this evidence representative? A survey of 10 people doesn't support a claim about millions. Is it recent? Data from 1980 might not apply today. Is it relevant? Customer satisfaction doesn't necessarily predict profitability.

Many GRE arguments present impressive-sounding statistics that, upon closer inspection, don't actually support the conclusion. Your job is to be skeptical—not cynical, but critically engaged.

Strategy 5: Practice Active Reading Techniques

Critical reasoning isn't passive absorption—it's active engagement. As you read, constantly question what you're seeing.

Try this annotation system: Mark conclusions with a "C," premises with a "P," and whenever you spot an assumption, write "A?" in the margin. This keeps your brain in analysis mode rather than reading mode.

Some aspirants find structured practice tools like PrepAiro helpful for building this habit systematically, but the key is consistency. You need to practice this active approach until it becomes automatic.

The goal isn't to read faster—it's to read smarter. Understanding the argument structure in 30 seconds is better than spending 90 seconds passively reading without insight.

Strategy 6: Anticipate Answer Choices

Before looking at the options, predict what the correct answer should do. This prevents the trap of selecting answers that sound good but don't address the argument's logical structure.

If the question asks you to weaken the argument, think: "What assumption could I challenge? What alternative explanation could I offer?"

If it asks you to strengthen the argument, consider: "What assumption could I support? What additional evidence would make this conclusion more solid?"

This prediction step takes only 5-10 seconds but dramatically improves accuracy. You're no longer guessing among five options—you're looking for the one that matches your prediction.

Strategy 7: Recognize Common Argument Patterns

The GRE recycles logical structures. Once you recognize these patterns, you'll spot them instantly:

The Plan Argument: "Problem X exists. We should implement Plan Y." The assumption? That Plan Y will solve Problem X, that it won't create worse problems, and that it's feasible.

The Analogy Argument: "Situation A and Situation B are similar. What worked in A will work in B." The assumption? That the similarities are relevant and the differences aren't significant.

The Causal Argument: "X happened, then Y happened. X caused Y." The assumption? No alternative explanations, no reverse causation, no coincidence.

When you recognize these templates, you immediately know what to look for and what kinds of assumptions are likely hidden.

Strategy 8: Don't Bring Outside Knowledge

This is crucial: GRE arguments exist in their own logical universe. Your job isn't to evaluate whether the premises are factually true—it's to evaluate whether the conclusion logically follows from them.

Even if you know that a premise is false in the real world, treat it as true within the argument. Focus purely on the logical structure.

This discipline prevents you from overthinking questions or bringing in tangential knowledge that clouds your analysis.

Common Pitfalls to Avoid

Pitfall 1: Confusing weak arguments with wrong arguments. An argument can have a valid conclusion even if the reasoning is flawed. Your job is to evaluate the reasoning, not judge the conclusion.

Pitfall 2: Selecting answers that address the topic but not the logic. Just because an answer choice discusses the same subject doesn't mean it strengthens or weakens the argument's logical structure.

Pitfall 3: Overthinking. The GRE tests logical reasoning, not creative thinking. The correct answer usually addresses the most obvious assumption or gap, not some obscure possibility.

Pitfall 4: Reading too quickly. Ironically, trying to save time by speed-reading often costs more time in the end. You'll miss critical details and need to re-read.

Putting It All Together: A Practice Approach

Here's a systematic workflow for tackling critical reasoning questions:

1. Read the question stem first to know what you're looking for
2. Read the argument and identify the conclusion
3. Identify the premises supporting that conclusion
4. Spot the assumption(s) connecting premises to conclusion
5. Predict what the correct answer should do
6. Evaluate answer choices against your prediction
7. Verify your selection addresses the argument's logic, not just its topic

This process might feel slow initially, but with practice, it becomes rapid and intuitive. You're building mental patterns that activate automatically.

How to Build This Skill Consistently

Critical reasoning isn't something you master in a week. It requires consistent, deliberate practice.

Start by analyzing one argument daily. Use real GRE practice questions and work through them methodically, even if it takes 10 minutes per question initially. Speed comes with pattern recognition.

After solving, review both correct and incorrect answers. Understanding why wrong answers are wrong is as valuable as understanding why right answers are right.

Keep an error log. When you miss a question, identify what you overlooked: Was it the assumption? Did you misidentify the conclusion? Did you fall for a trap answer? Patterns in your errors reveal exactly where to focus your practice.

The Real Benefit: Beyond the GRE

These critical reasoning skills extend far beyond test day. They make you a better evaluator of information in everyday life—whether you're reading news articles, evaluating business proposals, or making personal decisions.

You'll start noticing weak arguments everywhere: in advertisements, political speeches, social media posts. This analytical mindset is one of the most practical skills the GRE teaches, even if unintentionally.

Moving Forward

Critical reasoning mastery isn't about memorizing rules—it's about developing a habit of mind. Every argument you encounter becomes an opportunity to practice: What's the conclusion? What's the evidence? What's assumed?

The aspirants who excel aren't necessarily smarter—they're more systematic. They've trained themselves to see the logical skeleton beneath the surface details.

Start small. Pick one strategy from this guide and practice it deliberately for a week. Then add another. Gradual, consistent improvement beats cramming every time.

Your GRE score is a reflection of how you think, not just what you know. And how you think is entirely within your control to develop.

---

Frequently Asked Questions

How do I identify assumptions when they're not stated in the argument?

Look for logical gaps between the premises and conclusion. Ask yourself, "What must be true for this conclusion to follow?" Whatever answer emerges is likely an assumption. Practice by taking simple arguments from daily life and articulating what's left unsaid. The more you do this, the faster you'll spot unstated assumptions in GRE passages.

What's the difference between weakening an argument and proving it wrong?

Weakening means making the conclusion less likely or the reasoning less solid—it doesn't have to completely destroy the argument. The GRE rarely asks you to disprove conclusions entirely. Instead, look for answers that introduce reasonable doubt, challenge key assumptions, or present alternative explanations that make the conclusion less certain.

How can I improve my critical reasoning skills if I'm not naturally analytical?

Critical reasoning is a learned skill, not an innate talent. Start by analyzing opinion pieces in newspapers—identify the author's conclusion, the supporting evidence, and what they're assuming. Practice with one GRE question daily, spending as much time as needed to fully understand the logical structure. Pattern recognition develops with repetition, regardless of your starting point.

Should I spend time evaluating all five answer choices or stop when I find one that seems correct?

Initially, review all options to avoid trap answers that sound good but don't address the argument's logic. As you gain confidence, you can be more selective. However, always quickly scan remaining options even after choosing an answer—GRE wrong answers are often designed to seem correct on first glance.

How do I balance speed and accuracy in critical reasoning questions?

Accuracy comes first. A slow, correct answer beats a fast, wrong one. Build speed by practicing the same logical patterns repeatedly until recognition becomes automatic. Time yourself periodically to build stamina, but never sacrifice understanding for speed during practice. On test day, spend the time needed to understand each argument's structure—rushing leads to misreading conclusions or missing key assumptions.

Can I use critical reasoning strategies for Reading Comprehension passages too?

Absolutely. Reading Comprehension passages are essentially extended arguments. Identify the author's main claim (the passage's thesis), the supporting evidence (each paragraph's role), and the underlying assumptions. Questions asking you to weaken or strengthen the author's position work exactly like standalone critical reasoning questions. This approach transforms passive reading into active analysis, improving both comprehension and retention.