Skip to main content
Back to Current Affairs
PolitySource: The Hindu

Supreme Court Judges Appointment: Constitutional Debate and Concerns over Judicial Independence

Tuesday, 9 June 2026
Read Original Article

Key Points

The recent appointment of five new Supreme Court judges, including three through the Supreme Court (Number of Judges) Amendment Ordinance, 2026, has sparked a constitutional debate. This is crucial for UPSC aspirants, particularly for GS Paper 2, as it touches upon judicial independence and separation of powers. Last Updated: 09-06-2026

Key Facts About Supreme Court Judges Appointment

  • Parliamentary Prerogative: The Constitution initially allowed for a Chief Justice and "not more than seven judges" unless Parliament decides otherwise.
  • Article 124(1): Empowers Parliament to alter the number of Supreme Court judges by law.
  • Legislative Process: Involves the Chief Justice proposing additional judges, followed by Cabinet approval and a parliamentary amendment.
  • Article 123: Allows the President to issue Ordinances with the same force as an Act of Parliament, but these are temporary.
  • R.C. Cooper vs. Union of India (1970): Established that the President’s satisfaction for Ordinances is subject to judicial review.
  • D.C. Wadhwa v. State of Bihar (1986): Ruled against repeated re-promulgation of Ordinances without legislative approval.
  • Krishna Kumar Singh v. State of Bihar (2017): Stated that ordinance-making power is an exceptional measure, not a legislative substitute.

Constitutional Debate on Judicial Independence

The appointment of judges via Ordinance raises significant concerns about judicial independence, a cornerstone of India's democratic framework. This issue connects to India's strategic goal of maintaining a robust and impartial judiciary, crucial for upholding the rule of law and democratic governance. Comparatively, India's judiciary is often seen as a model for emerging democracies, but the reliance on Ordinances could undermine this reputation.

UPSC Relevance

  • GS Paper 2: Focus on the structure, organization, and functioning of the judiciary.
  • Prelims: Questions could focus on constitutional provisions like Article 124 and Article 123.
  • Mains: Analytical themes on judicial independence, separation of powers, and the role of Ordinances.
  • Essay Paper: Topics on the balance of power between the judiciary and executive.

FAQ Section

  • What is the Supreme Court (Number of Judges) Amendment Ordinance, 2026? It is a temporary executive measure that increased the number of Supreme Court judges, bypassing the usual legislative process.
  • Why is the appointment of judges via Ordinance important? It raises concerns about judicial independence and the separation of powers, as these positions are subject to executive control until legislatively approved.
  • What are the key features of Article 123? Article 123 allows the President to issue Ordinances during parliamentary recess, which have the same force as laws but are temporary.

Detailed Coverage

  • Supreme Court judges' appointment has sparked a constitutional debate.
  • Three judges appointed via a presidential decree.
  • Concerns raised about judicial independence and security of tenure.
  • Article 124(1) reserves power to alter judges' number for Parliament.
  • Legislative process involves proposals from the Chief Justice.
  • Article 123 allows the President to issue Ordinances.
  • Supreme Court can review the validity of Ordinances.
  • Repeated re-promulgation of Ordinances deemed a fraud on the Constitution.
  • Judicial appointments through Ordinance may compromise judicial independence.
  • Judges' positions dependent on the ruling party raises conflict of interest.
  • Concerns about legal anomalies if Ordinance lapses.
  • Institutional uncertainty for junior appointees in temporary positions.
  • Government's justification of case pendency lacks historical support.
  • Proposed measures include defining De Facto Doctrine boundaries.
  • Judges should recuse themselves from high-profile cases while temporary.
  • Conclusion emphasizes the need for an independent judiciary.
Polity

Practice Questions

Test your understanding of this article

Question 1 of 50 / 5 answered
1

In light of the constitutional provisions governing the appointment of judges to the Supreme Court, what is the primary legislative authority responsible for altering the number of judges, as enshrined in Article 124(1) of the Constitution of India?