Skip to main content
Back to Current Affairs
PolitySource: Indian Express

Centre's Proposed Amendment to Remove Ministers from Office: What the Supreme Court Has Previously Said on the Matter

Saturday, 23 August 2025
Read Original Article

Key Points

The Centre's proposed 130th Constitution (Amendment) Bill, 2025 seeks to mandate the removal of Ministers detained for serious offences, aiming to enhance governance and restore public trust. This amendment is crucial for UPSC aspirants, especially for General Studies Papers 2 and 3. Last Updated: 2025-08-23

Key Facts About the 130th Constitution (Amendment) Bill, 2025

  • 130th Constitution (Amendment) Bill, 2025 proposes changes to Articles 75, 164, and 239AA.
  • Ministers detained for 30 days for serious offences must be removed by the President.
  • Removal is reversible upon release from custody.
  • Objective is to uphold constitutional morality and good governance.
  • No automatic removal currently exists upon arrest.
  • Presumption of innocence applies until conviction.
  • Supreme Court rulings emphasize limitations on disqualification grounds.
  • Public Interest Foundation PIL (2018) recommended revoking membership for serious charges.

India's Governance and Political Accountability

The proposed amendment holds macro-level significance as it aligns with India's strategic goal of enhancing political accountability and reducing the criminalization of politics. With 45% of MLAs declaring criminal cases, the amendment seeks to restore public trust and ensure ethical governance. Internationally, India aims to strengthen its democratic framework by implementing transparent appointment processes and increased parliamentary oversight.

Related Government Schemes/Policies

  • Public Interest Foundation PIL (2018): Advocated for revoking membership for serious charges.
  • Ministerial Code of Conduct: Proposed to ensure ethical governance.

UPSC Relevance

  • GS Paper 2: Polity and Governance - Constitutional Amendments, Role of Judiciary.
  • GS Paper 3: Internal Security - Criminalization of Politics.
  • Prelims Angle: Questions on constitutional articles, amendment procedures, and Supreme Court rulings.
  • Mains Angle: Essays on governance, accountability, and political reforms.

FAQ Section

  • What is the 130th Constitution (Amendment) Bill, 2025?
    The bill proposes changes to Articles 75, 164, and 239AA to mandate the removal of Ministers detained for serious offences for over 30 days.
  • Why is the 130th Constitution (Amendment) Bill important?
    It aims to uphold constitutional morality, restore public trust, and enhance governance by addressing the criminalization of politics.
  • What are the key features of the amendment?
    Key features include mandatory removal of detained Ministers, reversible removal upon release, and emphasis on good governance and ethical conduct.

Detailed Coverage

  • 130th Constitution (Amendment) Bill, 2025 proposes changes to Articles 75, 164, and 239AA.
  • Ministers detained for 30 days for serious offences must be removed by the President.
  • Removal is reversible upon release from custody.
  • Objective is to uphold constitutional morality and good governance.
  • No automatic removal currently exists upon arrest.
  • Presumption of innocence applies until conviction.
  • Supreme Court rulings emphasize limitations on disqualification grounds.
  • Public Interest Foundation PIL (2018) recommended revoking membership for serious charges.
  • No legal barriers for appointing Ministers with criminal backgrounds.
  • Need for new provisions to tackle criminalization of politics.
  • 45% of MLAs declared criminal cases, affecting public trust.
  • Proposed measures include strengthening legal provisions for removal.
  • Transparent appointment processes to avoid criminal antecedents.
  • Increased parliamentary oversight on Ministers' conduct.
  • Implementation of a ministerial code of conduct for ethical governance.
  • The amendment aims to restore public trust while ensuring accountability.
Polity

Practice Questions

Test your understanding of this article

Question 1 of 50 / 5 answered
1

In the context of the proposed amendment, which of the following statements best reflects the relationship between ministerial accountability and the judicial process?